Typically, is social media goal setting and objectives planning are similar
to the general principles of PR-planning: reputation KPIs, audience coverage,
the wording of key points of communication. Further
objectives tree is constructed, the audience is segmented by quality groups, messages
for each of them are written. So
you start working and developing effective projects and actions on the best channels
of communication. I prefer to create a prototype of the communication model and
test on a focus group, adjust it if necessary, get a budget and start an implementation.
Coverage
of the tasks of social networks commensurate with their abilities - from
selling apples to crisis communications. You
can even conduct case studies, test product and choose the chief for your transportation
department. And the principles
of communications will meet these challenges. But it’s
very important to conform to generally accepted norms of behaviour. Don’t
be rude, don’t continue senseless debates, don’t even try to start censorship
on your blog. Also don’t lie. Please. It’s
rather better to be positive, non-intrusive, interesting, original erudite. Remember that you are a storyteller. A
good story told in time to the right person, can enter the company name in the history
of the market.
Friday, June 8, 2012
On-line ecology
On-line environmental
friendliness is very important. It is very sad to see the projects’
profiles, rapidly and successfully carried out, and then abandoned
at the mercy of spammers and bots. It is clear that qualitatively
promoted site with the high attendance
and popularity is very nice meal for commercial posters. Project ends, the participants
get their prizes, the company decided to
stop the SMM-promotion, and after month or two of old beauty and fascinating history we have
only painted graffiti wall spamming. It is rather strange as it’s very
easy to close the public access to the SMM-group. This is what I call "clean up". Actually,
again, nothing is original here -
in real world the maintenance of cleaning office, home or city is not even a
case to discuss.
Quantity and quality
The lack of
quantitative/qualitative focus the
audience will certainly play a
cruel joke on those for whom the
figures in the reports overshadow
the strategic objectives of the project.
For instance – one manager desperately
need to show a
convincing figure in the
statistics of visitors to the page by the end of the month. So he begins to
wreak news, comments,
videos and pictures of all available profiles.
Even, perhaps, fall to such a mechanism of "black PR" as bots and
the "ghosts". Perhaps, at the end of the month the statistics will shine with a four-five-digit numbers. But in reality, the reputation of the company / product / project will
not acquire anything new, but in very
advanced cases even lose. We remember
the shocking statistics from “Vkontakte”:
there were 76% of noodles in a "Rollton"
group, 73% in "Svyaznoy Bank,"
59% in Adidas and 37 % in
Coca-Cola. Conclusions are evident.
Main mistakes of social-media managers
As the social-media is still too new trend in corporate communications,
let's not talk about the "mistakes", but "failed experiments".
At least, PR-effect is very long story, who knows where those missteps will lead
their authors.
However, as Paul Holmes said on his lecture this April, there hasn’t appeared
any fundamentally new thing during last 80 years in public relations. Generally
speaking, the basis of all failures of web-PR-experiments are the same mistakes
as in off-line. In my opinion, the main factors of bad luck are reluctant to
listen to the audience, not understanding the difference between advertising
and PR, the lack of originality and creativity, as well as unwarranted
activity. As you can see, nothing new and it is typical for the Internet.
Specific things - such as too long texts are too big/ small pictures,
unattractive prizes for sweepstakes and confusing conditions – all this can be
corrected by own or somebody’s practice. In addition, the information field on
the Internet is changing rapidly, and today no one remember what exactly was so
terrible on the company’s page a month ago. This is great advantage of online,
but this is the main risk for you – you should always be faster, remembering that
the competitors warm your back by their breath. And everybody is copying
everything – or, ok we can say that the ideas are just flying on the air. So you
burn three days and caught a brilliant idea, admired your "fans" and
"likers", and next day after your neighbor added a couple features,
and sowed in his audience. A week later, no one will remember who was the first,
and the audience will become hungry for more fresh ideas. Lose the rhythm is another
great risk for the PR-specialist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)